[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#798057: marked as done (ITP RFS: node-sprintf-js/1.0.3-1)

Your message dated Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:29:04 +0200
with message-id <20150905192904.2128afd3@heffalump.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#798057: ITP RFS: node-sprintf-js/1.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #798057,
regarding ITP RFS: node-sprintf-js/1.0.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
798057: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798057
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-sprintf-js"

 * Package name    : node-sprintf-js
   Version         : 1.0.3-1
   Upstream Author :Alexandru Marasteanu
 * URL             : https://github.com/alexei/sprintf.js/issues
 * License         : BSD-3-Clause
   Section         : web

  It builds those binary packages:

    node-sprintf-js - JavaScript sprintf implementation

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-sprintf-js


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-sprintf-js/node-sprintf-js_1.0.3-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  About linitan warning I have fixed it directly on lintian (as a DM
of lintian).

This package is a direct depend of grunt

  Regards,
   bastien roucaries

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:49:50 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES
<roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> wrote:
> > Just a few comments:
> > * debian/README.Source should be README.source (policy 4.14)
> 
> DOne. Will add a lintian tag.
> > * debian/changelog still has UNRELEASED
> Done. Will also add a lintian tag

I like that approach, adding lintian tags for these kinds of things!

> > * I'd rather have "Priority: optional" but I didn't check the other
> >   dependencies
> Done.
> > * is there any point in symlinking the source code contained in the
> > upstream package in missing-sources (other than fixing a Lintian warning)?
> Removed. Fixed upstream on debian.
> 
> > * debian/copyright should reproduce the license grant given by upstream
> >   verbatim (OK, this is really "couper les cheveux en quatre")
> 
> Done

I meant that the "License" stanza in debian/copyright should really be copied
exactly from the LICENSE file (in this particular package), so

    diff -u <(cut -c2- debian/copyright) LICENSE

doesn't show any difference in the license content. But it's not that
important since the meaning is the same, so I'll upload the package as-is.
(Strictly speaking "All rights reserved." is a bit contradictory here, and it
may be considered part of the copyright statement rather than the license
grant... But upstream put it there, so let's keep it.)

Thanks for your work,

Stephen

Attachment: pgpqgsOH7sSbQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: