On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > > >> Version : 0.12.0-1 > > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. > > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpler to > > keep the same version, since I've modified the Files-Excluded field of the debian/copyright > > (thus the orig tarball). > I'm not sure what's the reasoning behind this. If the version was changed > to 0.12.0+dfsg-1 then it would be OK. Maybe there is some misunderstanding > here? > The reasoning is it saves having to add versionmangle options in d/watch, and I didn't think the version number change was necessary as the previous version was never shipped. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature