On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > >> Version : 0.12.0-1 > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpler to > keep the same version, since I've modified the Files-Excluded field of the debian/copyright > (thus the orig tarball). I'm not sure what's the reasoning behind this. If the version was changed to 0.12.0+dfsg-1 then it would be OK. Maybe there is some misunderstanding here? > >> * remove buildout related files from the source package > > As your orig tarball differs from the upstream repo (and the repo found in > > Vcs-*) and so from the tarball exported from the release tag by github, > > you'll need to note that in the upstream version number and provide a way > > to recreate such tarball, preferably as a get_orig_source d/rules target. > > > > I'm not sure I understand this. The orig tarball is built by uscan (from the > upstream tarball from github, then modified by mk-origtargz according to the > debian/copyright file). > > Isn't it the correct way to do this? Ah yes, so you already provide a way to recreate the tarball. Still, the upstream version should be changed. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature