Hi Mattia On 01/07/15 18:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML.
My bad.
On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS librarySure, because: *Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library' from 'RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library'*Request was from |Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org>|to |control@bugs.debian.org|. (Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:27:14 GMT) Full text <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;bug=790771>and rfc822 format <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;bug=790771;mbox=yes>available. Which still leaves my original question: why ?Try opening one of the link you posted ↑ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790771;msg=12 I see that the package at mentors has version 2.4-1 so I retitle the RFS to match that version.
So I should have removed the package sitting in mentors first ? I was planning to seek sponsorship via "sponsorship of blends" instead of mentors in the first place.
And indeed 2.4-2 was uploaded only today, after this change.
As per Fred's request indeed.
Btw, of course that's an automated email, by a service run by bartm to help keeping the RFS queue acceptable.
I sort of guessed that, but got surprised to see my RFS first renamed then closed so short after submission. Now, I think I know what I did wrong here.
Thanks for your explanation. Ghislain