Bug#790771: why closed ?

To: 790771@bugs.debian.org
Cc: bartm@quantz.debian.org
Subject: Bug#790771: why closed ?
From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:43:35 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 559418B7.3040106@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>, 790771@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <handler.790771.D790771.143576788415975.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E1ZAKoT-0001kX-Mw@quantz.debian.org> <[🔎] 559410AC.2000500@gmail.com> <handler.790771.D790771.143576788415975.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>

On 01/07/15 17:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package:

#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library

It has been closed by Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org> by
replying to this email.

WTH happened here ?

This is a RFS for clblas/2.4-2 not 2.4-1 which is indeed already in sid.

I am confused.

Ghislain

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#790771: why closed ?
  - From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>

References:
- Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library
  - From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#777586: marked as done (RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP])
Next by Date: Bug#790771: why closed ?
Previous by thread: Bug#790771: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library)
Next by thread: Bug#790771: why closed ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread