Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP
Am Sonntag, den 15.03.2015, 23:25 +0200 schrieb Antti Järvinen:
> Tobias Frost writes:
> > d/control:
> > -> Why did you switch do cdbs? (I do not sponsor packages using cdbs)
>
> All right, thank you for comprehensive look at things.
>
> Cdbs allowed me to have basically empty d/rules as I could not figure
> out how I was in disagreement with dh9 format of d/rules. Debhelper is quite
> enough for building the package, just the makefile format was the issue.
Usually, debhelper short format is also quite straight forward.
Let me know if you need hints or where you are stuck.
> But ok, I'll have a look at these issues.
>
> --
> Antti
>
--
tobi
Reply to: