On 10/26/2014 06:13 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > <pedantic> There are no "wishlist" lintian messages </pedantic> Hmm, it says "Severity: wishlist, Certainty: certain" :) Anyway > I'm have doubts. I think lintian is right. You know what's your library > name and you know the version part? I'm not an library guru, but I think > the library name is "libid3-3.8" and the version is 3.0.0, so lintian > expectd a symling from usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libid3-3.8.so to > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libid3-3.8.so.3.0.0 You certainly have a point there, the file names are indeed a good indicator. Yet libid3.so is the file name that upstream builds. If I were to change it, would that not potentially lead to all kinds of issues with other software that compiles against libid3? > For the other messages, at least P no-dep5-copyright are easily fixable > and dep5 is IMHO now considered as best-practice. That is true, a new version with a dep5 copyright file has been uploaded. cheers -- Stefan Ott http://www.ott.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature