Am Sonntag, den 26.10.2014, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Stefan Ott: > On 10/26/2014 01:43 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > (I do not intend to sponsor this package) > > > > Stefan, > > your package does contain lintian warnings. Many sponsor will not even > > look at your package with warnings present, so I advise you to fix them. > > Hi Tobias > > Thanks for the advice. Most of the current lintian warnings are > "pedantic" or "wishlist" and some of them directly affect the build > process. Since this upload adds multi-arch support to the package I > didn't want to mess too much with other aspects of building the package > - I'd rather have just one major building-related change per package > revision, makes it a bit easier to find bugs. <pedantic> There are no "wishlist" lintian messages </pedantic> > Also, the warning about dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink (which is the only > real complaint from lintian that I see) is IMHO not entirely correct. > lintian seems to expect a symlink called "libid3-3.8.so" while the > policy manual says "The development package should contain a symlink for > the associated shared library without a version number". I'm assuming > that this is because the id3lib package has not seen an upstream release > in over a decade and we are carrying lots of packing-related information > in our version strings these days (such as the "c2a" from the C++ ABI > change in 2005). I could of course just add a lintian override and be > done with it but I figured it would be better to keep this warning > around as a reminder for me to look into the issue. I'm have doubts. I think lintian is right. You know what's your library name and you know the version part? I'm not an library guru, but I think the library name is "libid3-3.8" and the version is 3.0.0, so lintian expectd a symling from usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libid3-3.8.so to usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libid3-3.8.so.3.0.0 For the other messages, at least P no-dep5-copyright are easily fixable and dep5 is IMHO now considered as best-practice. just my 2 cents. > Anyway, I *did* upload a new version which fixes a small issue with the > previous upload and I'm looking forward to additional comments. If > anyone feels the urge to upload it that would be appreciated. > > cheers -- tobi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part