[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]




Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, "Stephen Kitt" <skitt@debian.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:18 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
> <debian@jff-webhosting.net> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2014, 12:35 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > Line in d/changelog and comments in d/rules removed.
> > I think that hardening=+all is not necessary for argyll.
>
> OK.
>
> > [...]
> > > >   * debian/patches/
> > > >     - New 110_dispwin_segfault.patch to prevent segfault by
> > > >       wrong parameter (Closes: #700253)
> > >
> > > I see other patches as well... 15_jam.patch.org should be removed, along
> > > with the various patches which are no longer used in the series file (and
> > > you should clean up the series file too). In 110_dispwin_segfault.patch,
> > > is there a link to the mailing list archives you could copy in the
> > > "Forwarded" item?
> >
> > Link is included. Useless patches deleted and from d/p/series removed.
>
> I see a link in 15_jam.patch, but not in 110_dispwin_segfault.patch.
>
> Lintian doesn't reveal anything nasty about the package; there are a few
> pre-built Windows binaries, but the source is also included so there's no
> need to repack the source. The warning about the short license names is a
> false-positive which is fixed in lintian 2.5.27.
>
> Upgrading argyll does reveal a real problem though... Given that you're
> shipping all the documentation in argyll-doc, and symlinking from the other
> two packages, you need to replace the old directories with symlinks, using
> something like this in argyll's postinst:

Argggg please use dpkg-maintainer-script-helper....

> # Replace documentation directory with symlink
> if [ -d /usr/share/doc/argyll ] && [ ! -L /usr/share/doc/argyll ]; then
>     if rmdir /usr/share/doc/argyll 2>/dev/null; then
>         ln -sf argyll-doc /usr/share/doc/argyll
>     fi
> fi

You forget some case... buggy
> Otherwise /usr/share/doc/argyll ends up being an empty directory.
>
> Incidentally, doing this means that argyll depends on argyll-doc; was that
> intentional?
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen


Reply to: