Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> From some other discussion, I had understood that including the
> missing source was enough. What is your advice here : should I add a
> Makefile to regenerate those files that don't even get in the binary
> package? Should I repack the source to get rid of those (which would
> be a pity : the archived source package would be stripped of its test
> suite) ?
The ideal situation is that the upstream tarball (and VCS) contain
only source (no generated files) and contain no embedded code copies
of other projects. If you can convince them to do that it would be
helpful. If they want tarballs that contain more than just their
source, they could generate some extra ones.
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: