[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#742077: RFS: vcmi/0.95-1 [ITP]



Yes! Thanks. We need wait now.

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-08-29 10:52 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>:
> Hi,
>
> iyou dropped the ITP bug as a recipient - was that intended?
>
> In case it was I only quoted the small part below. I hope that's okay?
>
> Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-25 16:01:36)
>> 2014-08-24 17:22 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>:
>> > But vcmi itself is GPL-2+ and both resources agreed that Apache2 is compatible
>> > with GPL3. So could vcmi in Debian thus not be shipped as GPL3+ instead of
>> > GPL2+?
>>
>> I think that no. You can ask about this issue in mentors. However, I
>> think that this code is, currently, undistributable. I already had a
>> similar case and the upstream wrote a new code to drop an reused GPLed
>> code. The software is Yara.
>>
>> > I submitted the problem to the upstream bugtracker.
>> >
>> > http://bugs.vcmi.eu/view.php?id=1884
>>
>>
>> Ok. I hope you get a solution.
>
> the upstream of fuzzylite relicensed from apache 2.0 to LGPL 3.0 with the
> release of fuzzylite 5.0 (but not the versions prior to that).  So if upstream
> should upgrade their copy of the embedded fuzzylite, then the license problem
> should go away.
>
> cheers, josch


Reply to: