Hello Paul, at first thank you very much for uploading! Paul Gevers wrote on 2014-02-08 18:08: > - Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one > question is now part of the answer to another question. I am unsure if > this is intended. I haven't checked this point. I will do it for the next version. > - Your watch file doesn't work, please find attached a version that > works and at the same time takes advantage of the fact that upstream > signs its releases. You need the also attached keyring for that but feel > free to generate that yourself as well. Thanks for this hint. It comes from the seldom version number. I have installed the pgp key and tested your watch file locally. usan give me a warning, that the pgpsigurlmangle option is unknown. I will look futher for a solution. > - Your git repository would do well with a pristine-tar target, so I > don't need to download the upstream tar ball. That's right, but I never change something at the sources, so why should I add the sources, which do not exist as original archive in git repo? > - The patches are documented as not forwarded to upstream, why not > (three out of four)? You are right, I must forwarding some patches. And I must check all the other bug reports - perhaps some of them could be obsolete. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature