Bug#721839: RFS: musl/0.9.13-2 [ITP]
Ok, I uploaded it. Have done only minor change:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 346bdf2..9e328e6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
musl (0.9.13-3) unstable; urgency=low
- * Ready for Debian upload (Closes: #721839)
+ * Ready for Debian upload (Closes: #713072)
* Respect user set CC
* Reworked package according to feedback gven
by Anton Gladky. See #721839 for reference.
So you should close only ITP-bug. RFS-bug will be closed
manually.
Please, for future upload create only one additional
changelog-paragraph.
Cheers,
Anton
2013/9/21 Kevin Bortis <pkgs@bortis.ch>:
> Hi
>
> I have revorked the debian/copyright file according to the additional
> comments given by Paul Richards Tagliamonte (FTP Master).
>
> Work done:
> * Incorporated all copyright info given from upstream in their copyright file
> * grep over complete source tree for the term "Copyright" and
> controlled it against debian/copyright
>
> I hope to statisfy all copyright holders and of course the Debian policy.
>
> The updated copyright file can be found for review under:
> https://github.com/wermut/musl/blob/master/debian/copyright
> https://github.com/wermut/musl
>
> The updated package is not yet uploaded to debian mentors.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience and additional work.
>
> @ Boris Pek: Thank you for the tip.
>
> Regards
> Kevin
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Boris Pek <tehnick@debian.org> wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>>>>> The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
>>>>> - The package number should be 0.9.13-1
>>>>
>>>> Could I still keep the incrementation, because the earlier versions
>>>> are already tagged & signed in the public git repository and also
>>>> already uploaded to a Ubuntu PPA? (ppa:bortis/musl) So the first
>>>> version for uploading would be 0.9.13-3 if you accept. Or we can wait
>>>> for musl 0.9.14 wich, according to upstreams roadmap, will be released
>>>> in the next two weeks to get a clean 0.9.14-1.
>>>
>>> My feeling is that you'll need to keep the Ubuntu PPA and the Debian
>>> package seperated and have them NOT in the same git branch. This will
>>> save you trouble down the road as Debian != Ubuntu in many aspects and
>>> you will face situations where you need only to upload Debian or
>>> Ubuntu...
>>
>> Just small additional tips: use specific versioning scheme in your PPA.
>> For example: 0.9.14-0ppa1~raring1. As you can see, this version is lower that
>> version in official Debian and Ubuntu archives. So once updated package will hit
>> into main archive, it will be updated in users systems.
>>
>> I use this approach for a long period of time. You may find one of examples here:
>> https://launchpad.net/~tehnick/+archive/q4wine/+packages
>> Just look at "Newer version available" string.
>>
>> Related Git-repo:
>> https://github.com/tehnick/q4wine-debian
>> Just look at git tags.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Boris
Reply to: