Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)

[intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>]

Hi,

quidame wrote (20 Jul 2013 10:56:58 GMT) :
>> First, was the target distribution change in debian/changelog
>> intentional? (0.4.12 has experimental, 0.4.13 has unstable.)

> Yes it is; the target distribution was set to experimental for the
> wheezy's freeze duration... after what it was forgotten. Do you think
> I should revert to experimental ?

No, unstable should be fine.

Thanks for all the fixes. I've just reviewed and built 0.4.15 and
hoped to upload right away, but Lintian is still not happy:

W: bilibop-rules: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
N: 
N:    The extended description (the lines after the first line of the
N:    "Description:" field) contains an empty paragraph.
N:    
N:    Severity: normal, Certainty: certain
N:    
N:    Check: description, Type: binary, udeb
N: 
W: bilibop: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-lockfs: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-common: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-udev: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph

Looks like some buggy variable substitution.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc