[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries



On 2025/01/10 18:56, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/01/2025 05:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> -static ssize_t queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>> -					       const char *page, size_t count)
>> +static int queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>> +		const char *page, size_t count, struct queue_limits *lim)
>>   {
>> -	struct queue_limits lim;
>>   	unsigned long ios;
>>   	ssize_t ret;
>>   
>> @@ -284,18 +269,13 @@ static ssize_t queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>>   	if (ret < 0)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> -	lim = queue_limits_start_update(disk->queue);
>>   	if (ios)
>> -		lim.flags |= BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> +		lim->flags |= BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>>   	else
>> -		lim.flags &= ~BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> -
>> -	ret = queue_limits_commit_update(disk->queue, &lim);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	return count;
>> +		lim->flags &= ~BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> +	return 0;
>>   }
> 
> BTW, this function seems to duplicate queue_feature_store(), no?
> 
> I mean, why not:
> 
> static int queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
> const char *page, size_t count, struct queue_limits *lim)
> {
> 	return queue_feature_store(disk, page, count, lim,
> 		BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH);
> }
> 
> I think that there is even a macro for this.

Another cleanup to add to the pile I guess :)

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


Reply to: