That means: The "Assignee" (the ML) has precedence over decisions made by the "Contact" (you).- For the "Assignee", I would like to ask them to mention this mailinglist. […] - I'll leave the contact as is for now. RFC6335 mentions "The Contact person is the responsible person for the Internet community to send questions to. This person is also authorized to submit changes on behalf of the Assignee; in cases of conflict between the Assignee and the Contact, the Assignee decisions take precedence," which to me reads like a person is required (and I'm happy to continue filling this role).
🤔
- For the description, I would like to drop the "Linux" part in the description. There are implementations of NBD that are wholly unrelated to Linux, and so I don't think it's entirely accurate anymore to refer to NBD as a "Linux" protocol.
ACK.I am curious: Are there other OS (BSD flavours?) that uses NBD at the client side? If yes, they should be mentioned in the NBD's readme, I'd suggest.
- At the time, there was no public reference for the NBD protocol yet; I plan to add the link to proto.md on github as the official reference. Thoughts?
Go for it! :-) Lars R.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature