Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] Testing NBD server implementations for correctness
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:43:28 +0200
- Message-id: <20160926234328.izjz3v7x54az2e7l@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <FF7CB53B-8CEE-4190-B3B6-7A9C8E02E4CD@...872...>
- References: <57E74AFB.4070506@...2724...> <5720E25C-93C9-4DDB-B871-93DC5BA9CD5F@...872...> <20160925112411.byjfmv7qotamd7m4@...3...> <EA976193-41B3-4322-AFE5-8E01B1BF1002@...872...> <20160925210518.6dmxvue2bsvi7mag@...3...> <7AF202A4-2702-40F1-8A61-F2807F6D0D91@...872...> <20160926181240.voawr55mzoupg4fn@...3...> <FF7CB53B-8CEE-4190-B3B6-7A9C8E02E4CD@...872...>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 19:12, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...> wrote:
> > Yes. I understand how most of nbd works, but that is probably the one
> > thing I have always had trouble understanding. My usual answer to "how
> > do I deal with the integrity test" is "let's not". I obviously
> > must've understood it at some point (because I merged it, and I'm not in
> > the habit of merging code I don't understand), but it's pretty terrible
> > to grok.
>
> If it makes you feel any better, I had precisely the same experience
> rereading it,
Yes, somehow that does make me feel better :-)
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: