Re: [Nbd] [PATCH/RFC] Synchronize the option haggling phase

[Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:35:19AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> 
> On 18 Apr 2016, at 20:49, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:
> 
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
> >> ---
> >> doc/proto.md | 10 ++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> This one is my preferred fix.
> > 
> > Also my preferred fix; my recent patch proposal for
> > NBD_REP_ERR_BLOCK_SIZE_REQD is yet another case where strict lockstep
> > between client requests and server responses makes life easier to reason
> > about on whether a server will be using the error message in response to
> > NBD_OPT_INFO, based on whether it has already seen NBD_OPT_BLOCK_SIZE.
> 
> Let's see if we can persuade Wouter :-)

After having given this some thought over the past two (very busy :-/)
days, you have. Let's go with this.

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12