Re: [Nbd] nbd & discard/trim
- To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...856...>
- Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] nbd & discard/trim
- From: folkert <folkert@...421...>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:02:11 +0200
- Message-id: <20120823140210.GL27485@...855...>
- In-reply-to: <CAECXXi73O6cuwnfWQ6fCcTiYjGj6PUMUs3SOBiuJz2qCA2LZLQ@...18...>
- References: <20120809105752.GD14886@...855...> <20120809115751.GB22589@...3...> <CAECXXi7qU4sHK0=+wWTod-z7q94ZKuZWR2WengSPNRb414BuDA@...18...> <20120809153507.GE14886@...855...> <CAECXXi4=STwkUL3YRyrLPD+p2mwUKS3wt8vtEmW2KQbdu_52NA@...18...> <CAECXXi73O6cuwnfWQ6fCcTiYjGj6PUMUs3SOBiuJz2qCA2LZLQ@...18...>
> OK, attached are the two patches that I have queued. The first adds
> the SET_FLAGS ioctl. The second adds the TRIM/DISCARD support. Once
> people have had a chance to review and (ideally) test the patches I'll
> push to mainline. In particular, can someone please verify these
> patches are compatible with current nbd tools -- specifically the
> ioctl and flag values. I think I've got those right, but I'd like to
> be sure.
I'll see if I can allocate some time to test it.
In a previous attempt it all worked perfectly: when things were released
earlier. Please note that I always test using my own nbd-server program.
Reply to: