On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:42:39PM -0600, J. Ryan Earl wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:15:59AM -0600, J. Ryan Earl wrote: > >>What package is docbook-to-man a part of? > > > >docbook-to-man :-) > > > >http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/tools/dtm/docbook-to-man.tar.gz > > > > > Apparently Gentoo renames the binary to docbook2man. No, that's something else, although it's functionally equivalent :-) docbook2man is part of docbook-utils, which you can find at <ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/docbook-tools/new-trials/SOURCES/> This is starting to look like a mess. I'll try to get something better for 2.8 (like, not require you to build the manpage; I can do that myself, and make the built manpage part of the distributed tarball). > I'm working on an ebuild for this: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 > > I include it here for peer review. > > Cheers, > -ryan > > PS I'll probably have a ton more questions after I get a proper package > working. Heh. We'll see :-) [...] > src_compile() { > econf || die > emake || die > emake -C gznbd || die > } note that gznbd isn't really supported ATM (as in, "it might work, but it might just as well not, it's not documented, and I don't really care about security here"). I plan to merge it into the "main" nbd-server at some point in the future, but not just yet. Patches are welcome, but see http://nbd.sf.net/roadmap.html :-) -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature