On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 09:42:39PM -0600, J. Ryan Earl wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:15:59AM -0600, J. Ryan Earl wrote:
> >>What package is docbook-to-man a part of?
> >
> >docbook-to-man :-)
> >
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/tools/dtm/docbook-to-man.tar.gz
> >
> >
> Apparently Gentoo renames the binary to docbook2man.
No, that's something else, although it's functionally equivalent :-)
docbook2man is part of docbook-utils, which you can find at
<ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/docbook-tools/new-trials/SOURCES/>
This is starting to look like a mess. I'll try to get something better
for 2.8 (like, not require you to build the manpage; I can do that
myself, and make the built manpage part of the distributed tarball).
> I'm working on an ebuild for this:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54483
>
> I include it here for peer review.
>
> Cheers,
> -ryan
>
> PS I'll probably have a ton more questions after I get a proper package
> working.
Heh. We'll see :-)
[...]
> src_compile() {
> econf || die
> emake || die
> emake -C gznbd || die
> }
note that gznbd isn't really supported ATM (as in, "it might work, but
it might just as well not, it's not documented, and I don't really care
about security here"). I plan to merge it into the "main" nbd-server at
some point in the future, but not just yet. Patches are welcome, but see
http://nbd.sf.net/roadmap.html :-)
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature