Re: lsb-fhs test suite failures

To: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
Cc: lsb-test@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: lsb-fhs test suite failures
From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:44:17 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 15671.24801.277842.472969@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1020718081813.ZM23207@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>
References: <[🔎] 15670.27892.922516.827534@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 1020718081813.ZM23207@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>

Hi Andrew,

At 2002/7/18 09:18+0100  Andrew Josey writes:
> Since this would affect certification I think a LSB Certification
> problem report needs to be filed . My reading of the

I've just submitted the problem report.

> Btw is the allocated devices doc intended to be architecture neutral?

yes.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

Reply to:

References:
- lsb-fhs test suite failures
  - From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
- Re: lsb-fhs test suite failures
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>

Prev by Date: Answer to common failures?
Next by Date: Re: Answer to common failures?
Previous by thread: Re: lsb-fhs test suite failures
Next by thread: SI-ia64: LSB.os exec tests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread