Re: syslog_L 2
At 2002/3/25 22:52-0500 Joey Hess writes:
>
> Changing this would be a real PITA as every program that uses syslog
> would have to be recompiled.
>
> I take it you mean this example:
>
> int mask = LOG_MASK (LOG_ERR | LOG_USER);
> ...
> result = setlogmask(mask);
>
> I'm not sure what they're trying to do here, since LOG_USER is a
> facility, not a priority level. Anyway, I don't see any examples that
> show or'ing together of two priority levels.
Hmm. it says that further syslog calls will be accepted if they are
error messages or produced by arbitary process. But you're right in
that this isn't an example of what you were talking about and a change
to allow it would be major pain.
Regards,
Chris
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
Reply to: