Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol

To: Andrew Josey <ajosey@opengroup.org>
Cc: lsb-test@linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:21:51 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020304082151.C17410@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1020304065713.ZM12595@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>; from ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 06:57:13AM +0000
References: <[🔎] 20020301180328.F25850@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <[🔎] 1020302064628.ZM8821@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> <[🔎] 20020302135517.D19400@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <[🔎] 1020304065713.ZM12595@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>

Thanks, I'll file a glibc bug.

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 06:57:13AM +0000, Andrew Josey wrote:
> Matt
> I checked POSIX and see where the reference to ISO-4217
> comes in. The reference in POSIX is to
> ISO 4217:1995 standard, the symbols you referred to are
> in the 1995 edition of the standard and thus required.

Reply to:

References:
- 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
  - From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
- Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
- Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
  - From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
- Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>

Prev by Date: Re: lsb_realpath segfaults on nonexistant directories
Next by Date: Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
Previous by thread: Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
Next by thread: Re: 'DEM ', 'FRF ' no longer valid in int_curr_symbol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread