Re: LSB.os/readv_L 22

To: lsb-test@linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: LSB.os/readv_L 22
From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:36:11 +1100
Message-id: <15456.52955.909333.255258@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <1020201152733.ZM19289@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>
References: <20020201123759.A17730@suse.de> <20020201135451.A16140@suse.de> <1020201152733.ZM19289@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>

Andrew Josey writes:
> I agree , after reviewing the specs and the tests,
> you are correct for readv_L:22, and 23, these should be
> classified as TSDs (test suite deficiencies)

I've updated the test suite database to reflect this.

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia

Reply to:

References:
- LSB.os/readv_L 22
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
- Re: LSB.os/readv_L 22
  - From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
- Re: LSB.os/readv_L 22
  - From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>

Prev by Date: Re: LSB.os/writev_L 30: path tracing error
Next by Date: where is application form
Previous by thread: Re: LSB.os/readv_L 22
Next by thread: LSB.os/readv_L 24 UNREPORTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread