Re: Updated LSB test suites

[Doug Beattie <dbb@caldera.com>]

Chris:

I found I needed to add a /pub in front of lsb/test_suites/... below
to access the new test appropriately.

"ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution";

Doug

Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> 
> Stew Benedict writes:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > > and a lot of segfaults:
> > > unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received
> > >
> > > Looks like nealy all stramio/freopen tests seg.faults.
> > >
> > > I will now try to compile the testsuite myself on this machine.
> > >
> >
> > Pretty much the same results here, many more failures than the
> > lsb-distribution test 0.9-2.  About 40 more failures and nearly 100 more
> > unresolved. Also for both the last versions of the test the loop device
> > is not released and the machine has to be rebooted to do another run.
> >
> 
> I've put up lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-2.i386.rpm in
> ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution
> 
> This is identical to lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm except it
> wasn't compiled inside lsbdev.
> 
> Stew and Thorsten could you give this one a go and see if you still
> see the problems - this should determine whether its a problem with
> lsbdev (or due to the recent changes or way I'm building the rpm).
> 
> At the moment there seem to be conflicting results as
> lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1.i386.rpm was compiled with lsbdev (which
> some report as ok) and others have had problems with anything after
> lsb-distribution-test-0.9-2.i386.rpm (the last to not use lsbdev)
> 
> Chris
> --
> cyeoh@au.ibm.com
> IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
> Canberra, Australia
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

-- 
Douglas B. Beattie
------------------
Test Architect - Caldera, Inc.
dbb@caldera.com