Re: Updated LSB test suites
Stew Benedict writes:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > and a lot of segfaults:
> > unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received
> > Looks like nealy all stramio/freopen tests seg.faults.
> > I will now try to compile the testsuite myself on this machine.
> Pretty much the same results here, many more failures than the
> lsb-distribution test 0.9-2. About 40 more failures and nearly 100 more
> unresolved. Also for both the last versions of the test the loop device
> is not released and the machine has to be rebooted to do another run.
I've put up lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-2.i386.rpm in
This is identical to lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm except it
wasn't compiled inside lsbdev.
Stew and Thorsten could you give this one a go and see if you still
see the problems - this should determine whether its a problem with
lsbdev (or due to the recent changes or way I'm building the rpm).
At the moment there seem to be conflicting results as
lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1.i386.rpm was compiled with lsbdev (which
some report as ok) and others have had problems with anything after
lsb-distribution-test-0.9-2.i386.rpm (the last to not use lsbdev)
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group