Re: Updated lsbappchk 1.1.1
- To: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org>
- Cc: lsb-test <lsb-test@linuxbase.org>
- Subject: Re: Updated lsbappchk 1.1.1
- From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:23:49 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020101132349.A19419@suse.de>
- In-reply-to: <15390.61090.973737.482681@gargle.gargle.HOWL>; from cyeoh@samba.org on Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:22:10PM +1100
- References: <15390.61090.973737.482681@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Tue, Dec 18, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>
> An updated lsbappchk has been uploaded to the freestandards.org ftp
> site. This version is aligned with what will be the 1.1 version of the
> specification.
I have a question about the license of this packages.
lsbappchk has no license informations except the "GPL" entry in the
RPM.
lsblibchk shares some code with lsbappchk. The RPM says "GPL", but
the package contains a file with "Artistic License".
What is now the correct license for this packages? I think it would
be a good idea to add a short notice to every source file, under
which license it is.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE GmbH Deutschherrenstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
Reply to: