Re: [Fwd: conformance]
George Kraft IV writes:
> or application would mean that the suppiler makes a social testimonial
> to the Linux community. The supplier states, without endorsement
> from the LSB or FSG, that to their knowledge their deliverable, at the
> time of its release, follows the LSB standard.
>
> Specifically for Linux distributions:
>
> 1) follows the LSB written specification
> 2) passes the binary LSB TET test suite provide by the LSB
> 3) passes the binary lsblibchk, lsbdevchk
Distributions shouldn't have to pass lsbdevchk unless they want to
claim being able to create LSB compliant applications with their
distribution (ie they've implemented a build environment).
Chris.
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
Reply to: