[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Test cases that are possible candidates for a waiver



This is excellent detail.  Will this information be logged in the database?

http://www.freestandards.org/lsb/test/results/index.php?testcaseid=4039

George (gk4)

Andrew Josey wrote:
> 
> For _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX, POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.1-1996 and UNIX 98 have
> the value 3 -- the test modes are aligned with these specifications.
> POSIX.1-2001 and the Single UNIX Spec V3 have the value 6.  This
> was a change due to the merger of the POSIX P1003.1a draft.
> 
> We should waive the
> _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX test case since glibc is following the future direction.
> 
> regards
> Andrew
> 
> On Dec 10, 11:05am in "Re: Test cases that ", Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > >  /tset/POSIX.hdr/misc/limits/T.limits-3
> >
> > _POSIX_PATH_MAX is wrong in glibc, fixed.
> >
> > _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX is wrong in the test suite, the new value is 6 and
> > glibc is correct here -> look at my bugreport in the bug tracker.
> >
> >   Thorsten
> >
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

-- 
George Kraft IV
gk4@austin.ibm.com



Reply to: