[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

LSB Comparison of Redhat versions 7.1 and 7.2



Looking at the results from the OS and PCTS suites, one notices that
Redhat 7.2 fails MORE tests than 7.1.  The following are the tests that
went from pass for 7.1 to fail for 7.2:

OS:
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_error/T.aio_error 1 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_read/T.aio_read 1 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_read/T.aio_read 11 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_return/T.aio_return 1 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_write/T.aio_write 1 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_write/T.aio_write 12 PASS,FAIL
/tset/LSB.os/files/dev_tty/T.dev_tty 1 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 20 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 22 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ipc/shmctl/T.shmctl 3 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ipc/shmctl/T.shmctl 5 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ipc/shmctl/T.shmctl 13 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/ipc/shmctl/T.shmctl 15 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execl_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execle_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execlp_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execv_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execve_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED
/tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.execvp_L 6 PASS,UNRESOLVED

PCTS:
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 1 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 2 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 3 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 4 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 5 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 8 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 9 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 17 PASS,FAIL
/tset/ANSI.os/locale/setlocale/T.setlocale 18 PASS,FAIL
/tset/POSIX.os/files/readdir/T.readdir 10 PASS,FAIL
/tset/POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf/T.sysconf 3 PASS,UNRESOLVED

Test results used in the comparison can be found at:

ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/test_results

Any ideas or comments?

Arnold



Reply to: