Re: C++ ...

To: anderson@metrolink.com (Stuart Anderson)
Cc: gduval@mandrakesoft.com (Gael Duval), msw@redhat.com (Matt Wilson), gorlando@futuretg.com (Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando), gk4@austin.ibm.com, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: C++ ...
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:51:53 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] E16zv5d-000840-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020422141240.O527-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com> from "Stuart Anderson" at Apr 22, 2002 02:13:45 PM

> A distribution can both be LSB conforming, and ship with KDE libraries. It's
> just that right not, KDE is not a part of the LSB, so LSB compliant
> applications cannot link to them dynamically.

Unlesss they include the kde packages in case.

KDE standardising needs to follow Qt getting a stable API (maybe Qt3 does 
this). What do Troll tech think


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-spec-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ ...
  - From: Chris Howells <chris@chrishowells.co.uk>
- QPL (was Re: C++ ... )
  - From: Matt Taggart <taggart@carmen.fc.hp.com>

References:
- Re: C++ ...
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>

Prev by Date: Re: C++ ...
Next by Date: Re: C++ ...
Previous by thread: Re: C++ ...
Next by thread: Re: C++ ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread