Re: appchk/libc functions
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On the current LSB spec, the rexec() call is sorted under
> "Regular expressions". But rexec() is a (I think BSD) function
> for remote execution and used by the rexec command. This should
> be fixed.
I would propose that the function be removed entirely.
> And I have some curious error messages from appchk:
>
> I get for all applications:
> - section .sbss is not in the LSB
When did .sbss get added? What does it do? It's not documented anywhere.
> Then I sometimes get the message that a Symbol has version number
> GLIBC_2.2, but GLIBC_2.1 is expected (for example for __xstat64).
This is an interesting result. Is this the only symbol the gives this message?
> I often also get the message, that symbol GLIBC_2.0 was found,
> but .bss was expecting.
I think I fixed that last week. Do you have the latest version of the lsbdev
package?
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@metrolink.com
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/ XFree86 Core Team
Creative Applications Lab Chair - SIGGRAPH 2001
Reply to: