Re: PROPOSED: 32/64 bit coexistance
Wow, that looks like something I proposed a few times and which
I fully agree with the text, except for:
Previously George Kraft IV wrote:
> > > Thus we're suggesting that /lib is always a
> > > symbolic link to /lib32 to grant backward compatibility and new 64bit
> > > applications to use and install into /lib64.
This is ignoring the fact that there is a more in /lib then just
libraries, as well as that the very same issue holds for /usr/lib.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |