Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 01:26:33PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Yes, which is why the hard-coded user/group id isn't that big of a
> deal. It only applies for those folks who wish to distribute LSB
> application using raw cpio files. If we decide this isn't
> particularly important, we can drop the requirements on the uid
> ownership for bin.
If cpio is the distribution medium, why all the hoopla over rpm? If rpm
is the standard, why the concern about cpio?