On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:12:36AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > Volunteers to help add LSB support for Debian would be wonderful, if > you could find any takers. And if there are other sections of the LSB > which turn out to be hard to implement, or where the LSB is > inconsistent, let us know, and we can try to fix it in the next > release. Uh, is there any existing free implementation related code? .lsb packages that are expected to be able to be installed on compliant distros to test with, sample implementations of lsb_release, lsb/install_initd, lsb/remove_initd, and lsb/init-functions, or anything similar? The "Implementation" stuff seems to be mainly focussed on getting libraries synced up (as does the spec itself, really). Hmm, there's a bug in the "System Initialization / Init Script Actions" section: presumably we know whether start-stop-daemon is included in the LSB by now. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpoUY6Q5UViz.pgp
Description: PGP signature