[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Specification v 0.8



Circa 2001-Apr-29 00:52:17 +0200 dixit Wichert Akkerman:

: Previously Jim Knoble wrote:
: > In fact, it's possible that systems such as FreeBSD would be able to
: > meet the LSB spec.
: 
: If you use that reason the name `Linux Standards Base' is just
: as incorrect as `GNU/Linux Standards Base'.

At the risk of repeating myself:

Circa 2001-Apr-28 18:49:56 -0400 dixit Jim Knoble:

: Putting "GNU" in the name of the spec would seem to be too narrow.  If
                                                                     ^^^
: any renaming is necessary, it should be toward widening the implied
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: coverage rather than narrowing it.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

-- 
jim knoble | jmknoble@jmknoble.cx | http://www.jmknoble.cx/
(GnuPG fingerprint: 31C4:8AAC:F24E:A70C:4000::BBF4:289F:EAA8:1381:1491)

Attachment: pgpJSVA1Ih2uz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: