Re: Specification v 0.8

To: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Cc: atai@atai.org
Subject: Re: Specification v 0.8
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:52:17 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010429005217.F26411@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, atai@atai.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010428184956.V1235@quipu.half.pint-stowp.cx>; from jmknoble@jmknoble.cx on Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:49:56PM -0400
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0104260904500.3925-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com> <[🔎] 20010426172249.35659.qmail@web10502.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20010428184956.V1235@quipu.half.pint-stowp.cx>

Previously Jim Knoble wrote:
> In fact, it's possible that systems such as FreeBSD would be able to
> meet the LSB spec.

If you use that reason the name `Linux Standards Base' is just
as incorrect as `GNU/Linux Standards Base'.

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@jmknoble.cx>
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: "David L. Nicol" <david@kasey.umkc.edu>

References:
- Specification v 0.8
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: Andy Tai <lichengtai@yahoo.com>
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@jmknoble.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: Specification v 0.8
Next by Date: Re: Specification v 0.8
Previous by thread: Re: Specification v 0.8
Next by thread: Re: Specification v 0.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread