[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [johannes@caldera.de: Comments on Chapter 17 (cron) of the LSB Spec]



On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Greg Wright wrote:

> On 7/12/00 at 11:36 Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> >Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 07:46:49 -0500
> >   From: Wade Hampton <whampton@staffnet.com>
> >
> >   Questions:
> >   1.  Would this have any impact on embedded systems?
> >
> >None; embedded systems aren't expected to be LSB complaint.  (Remember,
> >the initial scope of the LSB is to make sure that ISV's like Intuit can
> >ship a single version of TurboTax that will work on any distribution.)
>
> Embedded is a pretty wide ranged area, we have had Linux on a floppy that
> could easily be called "Embed able", so why should it not follow LSB where
> possible ?

While you may not expect an embedded system to be LSB compliant there is
nothing in your way to follow as much of the LSB as is usable.

Hugo.

-- 
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ  Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl	http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
This message has not been checked and may contain harmfull content.



Reply to: