Re: Package System specification

To: lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: Package System specification
From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:11:40 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000414011140.R16710@quipu.earth>
Mail-followup-to: lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Reply-to: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m3itxlmfuk.fsf@elijah.nodomainname.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10004132137070.16177-100000@www.slackware.com> <[🔎] m3itxlmfuk.fsf@elijah.nodomainname.net>

På 2000-Apr-13 klokka 22:06:11 -0700 skrivet Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo:

: IIRC, the RedHat and Debian people are working on such a proposal (a
: new common package format) privately. Unforunately, I'm not sure who
: the mebers of this "packaging cabal" are, and I for one would like to
: see them open this up a bit.

I remember reading about this in the (now not so) recent message
blizzard on lsb-discuss; i thought it was one of the team members who
mentioned it. I believe the reason they're not more publicized is to
avoid the Current effect.  Check lsb-discuss archives.

-- 
jim knoble
jmknoble@pobox.com

Reply to:

References:
- Package System specification
  - From: David Cantrell <david@slackware.com>
- Re: Package System specification
  - From: "Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo" <jkaivo@elijah.nodomainname.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Package System specification
Next by Date: Re: Package System specification
Previous by thread: Re: Package System specification
Next by thread: Re: Package System specification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread