[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shared Libraries and naming conventions

On Sun, 30 May 1999, Daniel Quinlan wrote:

> When the issue has come up, I've been pretty firm on the point that the
> LSB sample implementation will only include LGPL or X-Consortium style
> (or another license no more restrictive than either) licenses for
> libraries.

So you're not going to include db 2.x? That will make compiling glibc 
interesting at best.

> By the way, if you object to the policy of not accepting GPL libraries
> in the LSB sample implementation, now is the time to let me know.

It seems pretty unrealistic at best, unfortunately.


|       "For the next two hours, VH1 will be filled with foul-mouthed,        |
|          crossdressing Australians. Viewer discretion is advised."          |
|                                                                             |
|   Linux Application Development  --  http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad    |

Reply to: