[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems building si



>> The next problem I have not been able to get around yet. During the
>> lsbsi-intermediate phase it fails when trying to build glibc. Here's a
>> snipet of the output:
>>
>> -: /bin/sh: BEGIN { subdirs = ""; inhibit = "" };
>> /^#/
>> { next };                                                /^[^-]/ {
subdirs
>> = s
>> ubdirs " " $0 };                         /^-/ { inhibit = inhibit " "
>> substr($
>> 0, 2) };                 END { printf "sysdep-subdirs =%s\n", subdirs;
>>  printf "sysdep-inhibit-subdirs =%s\n", inhibit;         print
>> "sysd-dirs-done
>>  = t" }: No such file or directory
>> -: make[1]: *** [/usr/src/glibc-build/sysd-dirs] Error 127
>> -: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.2.5'
>> -: make: *** [all] Error 2
>> I: Log file stored in "/root/.nALFS/packages/glibc-2.2.5.log".
>> E: Execution failed (2).
>> I: Executing for 00:51:11, total 00:51:11.
>> I: Status window is now active.
>>
>>
===========================================================================
>>===
>>
>> I'm sure I must be missing something, but I don't know what. I would
>> appreciate it if someone could help.
>>
>
>This is a problem with awk not building, getting installed, something.>

I just took a look at my lsbsi-intermediate directories and found awk
installed in lsbsi-intermediate/usr/local/bin. When I look at the
.bash_profile in lsbsi-intermediate/root it does not include /usr/local/bin
in PATH. This would explain why awk is not being found. I see in the
phase2/system-config/profile.xml file that it should be setting PATH
appropriately, but it doesn't work for me. Could it have something to do
with the fact my regular root account does not have /usr/local/bin in its
path? On my Red Hat 7.3 system I don't even have anything installed in
/usr/local/bin.

Regards,

Marvin Heffler
Linux Standard Base
IBM Linux Technology Center
11400 Burnet Road, Zip 908-1A33
Austin, TX 78758
(512) 838-0953    T/L 678-0953




Reply to: