[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

LSB dependency in SI

It's been quite a while since I looked
at a fresh LSB-si, but if I recall, we
start out with an uninitialized rpm

I don't think this is quite right.  We
do allow (in fact, require) LSB packages
to have the 'lsb' dependency, and although
we currently have to install things --nodeps,
I believe the correct approach would be to
build some minimal package that provides
'lsb' that is installed into the LSB-si
right off the bat, since I think by implication
whatever the packaging system has to be
set up to accept that as a dependency,
and if our packages weren't otherwise
broken, they'd fail on the lack of this.

Am I thinking this wrong, or does this
make sense?


Reply to: