RE: extension of lsb packages
> Let me backup and correct myself. The LSB specifies an
> "lsb-" prefix for the
> package name ("Name" specified inside the RPM .spec
> configuration file), not the
> RPM file name itself. So, for application "foo" we have the foo.spec
> configuration file with the package name defined as
> "lsb-foo". The user would
> install "foo.rpm", but would see "lsb-foo" in the system's
> software registry.
Fine, but isn't there a widespread convention that the
package name serve as the base of the file name?