[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: extension of lsb packages

> This is Unix (well, almost) folks. Any tool that depends on 
> the extension of a filename to work properly is simply 
> broken.

That's a silly statement.  The rule is that the extensions
don't matter to the /kernel/ - and they don't - but they may 
matter to programs that are going to process a particular
file, and there are plenty of examples where they do.  Try 
using the C compiler to compile a source file you've chosen 
to name foo.q 

Nonetheless, this is a problem we need to solve cleanly,
and solving it just by suffixes is probably not sufficient,
although perhaps a useful hint to humans.

* How can an LSB RPM be distinguished from a non-LSB one?

* Can this be done without requiring existing tools to rev?

Reply to: