[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> The LSB doesn't define what happens when you use a command or library
> function that is not in the LSB. If you use glibc internal functions you
> will get burned (especially if the folks trying to replace glibc with
> something much lighter actually succeed)

>From Chapter 1: Definitions.

Non-LSB-Compliant Application

An application which has been written to include system routines, commands, or
other resources not included in this document, or which has been compiled into
a format different from those specified here, or which does not behave as
specified in this document.

This sort of says it, though in an indirect way.


Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson@metrolink.com

Metro Link Incorporated                          South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way                           129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309                   Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500                              voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/                        XFree86 Core Team

Reply to: