Re: LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo

[Doug Beattie <dbb@caldera.com>]

Then, in general the specification should state that any options not
documented, but found to be present in any command/function, should
not be used as they will not have been tested and results cannot be
guaranteed.

Can we make a blanket statement that will satisfy all such conditions
so we don't have to go through and document each and every situation
within the specification?


Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > And as the standard does not say that the program may have nonstandard
> > options that remove the need to follow the rmdir() rules, it is obvious that
> > the rm program must follow the rmdir() rules in all cases even when
> > using nonstandard options.
> 
> The standard does not say that a command cannot have non standard options
> that do nonstandard things.
> 
> Alan
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-discuss-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

-- 
Douglas B. Beattie
------------------
Test Architect - Caldera, Inc.
dbb@caldera.com