Re: Undecided Interfaces
Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com> writes:
> On 7 Mar 2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> > Some functions are from Sun RPC - I don't know if we decided already on adding
> > Sun RPC or not. Only add those functions if we add Sun RPC.
>
> The problem, is that we can't find a standard for the APIs. There is an RFC for
> the protocol, but not the API.
>
> > step: Drop.
>
> This is part of the regex stuff. Should it really be dropped?
An oversight. Please add it.
> This list brings up a new issue. There are a lot of GNU extensions to add.
> Given the time constraints on 1.0, I wonder if we should create a defered
> catagory and put most of the GNU extensions in it. This would be desirable
> so we could minimize the amount of documentation that has to be written
> for 1.0, but lets us mark them as something to work on for 1.1.
That would be fine for me - but the consensus should be to add the
better (most of them are ;-) GNU extensions (I suggested to drop those
functions that can easily be rewritten).
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
Reply to: