Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt

To: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
Cc: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:47:06 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010306124706.C7346@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0103061146440.38841-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com>; from anderson@metrolink.com on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 20010301175530.A12699@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0103061146440.38841-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com>

Yup.  Looks good.

Thanks.

Matt

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> 
> elfchk handles 64 bit Elf now.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
  - From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
- Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>

Prev by Date: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Next by Date: Undecided Interfaces
Previous by thread: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Next by thread: exclude GLX symbols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread