Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt

To: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
Cc: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:47:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0103061146440.38841-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010301175530.A12699@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Matt Wilson wrote:

> BTW - elfchk seems to do only 32 bit elf?


elfchk handles 64 bit Elf now.

                                Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson@metrolink.com

Metro Link Incorporated                          South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way                           129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309                   Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500                              voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/                        XFree86 Core Team
Creative Applications Lab Chair - SIGGRAPH 2001

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
  - From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>

References:
- Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
  - From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ncurses specification
Next by Date: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Previous by thread: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Next by thread: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread