oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt

To: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:20:03 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010301142003.Q12699@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

The database hard codes the size of all the types - so we're stuck
with all this data that only applies to ia32.  Will we be setting up
parallel tables for each architecture?

Cheers,

Matt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>

Prev by Date: devchk makes assumptions on sizeof void*
Next by Date: exclude GLX symbols
Previous by thread: devchk makes assumptions on sizeof void*
Next by thread: Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread